Paper detail

A DSL for Defining Feature-Level Quality Constraints and the Aggregation of Evaluation Results in DevOps

Quality requirements typically differ among software features, e.g., due to different usage contexts of the features, different impacts of related quality deficiencies onto overall user satisfaction, or long-term plans of the developing organization. For instance, maintainability requirements might be particularly high for software features which are frequently used or bear strategic value for the developing organization. Also, software features where even the smallest delays are perceived as negative by the user will be subjected to specially tight performance requirements. We defined an operational DSL to define software quality requirements as individual feature-level constraints based on quantitative measures. The DSL provides language elements to define the operationalization of measures from external systems, time series operations, time filters, and the automatic evaluation of these feature-level constraints in DevOps based on comparison operators and threshold values. In addition, quality ratings summarize evaluation results of features on an ordinal grading scheme. Likewise, quality gates use these quality ratings to reflect the fitness of software features or the overall software product using different states. Finally, we show an example based on a widely-adopted secure mobile messaging app that illustrates the interplay of the different DSL elements.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.