Paper detail

A Distant Origin For Magnified LIGO/Virgo Black Holes Implied By Binary Component Masses

The primary and secondary masses of the binary black holes (BBH) reported by LIGO/Virgo are correlated with a narrow dispersion that appears to increase in proportion to mass. The mean binary mass ratio $1.45\pm0.07$ we show is consistent with pairs drawn randomly from the mass distribution of black holes in our Galaxy. However, BBH masses are concentrated around $\simeq 30M_\odot$, whereas black holes in our Galaxy peak at $\simeq 10M_\odot$. This mass difference can be reconciled by gravitational lensing magnification which allows distant events to be detected with typically $z\simeq 2$, so the waveform is reduced in frequency by $1+z$, and hence the measured chirp masses appear 3 times larger than their intrinsic values. This redshift enhancement also accounts for the dispersion of primary and secondary masses, both of which should increase as $1+z$, thereby appearing to scale with mass, in agreement with the data. Thus the BBH component masses provide independent support for lensing, implying most high chirp mass events have intrinsic masses like the stellar mass black holes in our Galaxy, coalescing at $z>1$, with only two low mass BBH detections, of $\simeq 10M_\odot$ as expected for unlensed events in the local Universe, $z\simeq 0.1$. This lensing solution requires a rapidly declining BBH event rate below $z<1$, which together with the observed absence of BBH spin suggests most events originate within young globular clusters at $z>1$, via efficient binary capture of stellar mass black holes with randomly oriented spins.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.