Paper detail

A distance estimate based on angular expansion for the planetary nebula NGC 6881

In this paper, we report on high angular resolution radio observations of the planetary nebula NGC 6881 obtained with the Very Large Array at a wavelength of 6 cm. The emission appears to be the superposition of a roundish core and a point-symmetric bipolar structure elongated along a position angle of about 145$^\circ$. This is strongly reminiscent of the morphology seen in H$α$ and [NII] images. A comparison between VLA observations obtained in 1984 and 1994 clearly reveals the expansion of the core of the nebula, at a rate of 2.1 $\pm$ 0.7 mas yr$^{-1}$. Assuming that the expansion velocity in the plane of the sky (determined from these measurements) and the expansion velocity along the line of sight (estimated from optical spectroscopy available in the literature) are equal, we find a distance to NGC 6881 of 1.6 $\pm$ 0.5 kpc $\pm$ 0.3 kpc, where the first error reflects the uncertainty on the expansion, and the second error comes from the potential difference between pattern and material speeds. This distance is compatible with (but does not necessarily imply) an association of NGC 6881 with the nearby HII region Sh 2-109 and, more generally, the Cygnus star-forming region.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.