Paper detail

A direct approach to the S-functional calculus for closed operators

The $S$-functional calculus for slice hyperholomorphic functions generalizes the Riesz-Dunford-functional calculus for holomorphic functions to quaternionic linear operators and to $n$-tuples of noncommuting operators. For an unbounded closed operator, it is defined, as in the classical case, using an appropriate transformation and the $S$-functional calculus for bounded operators. This is however only possible if the $S$-resolvent set of the operator contains a real point. In this paper, we define the $S$-functional calculus directly via a Cauchy integral, which allows us to consider also operators whose resolvent sets do not contain real points. We show that the product rule and the spectral mapping theorem also hold true with this definition and that the $S$-functional calculus is compatible with polynomials, although polynomials are not included in the set of admissible functions if the operator is unbounded. We also prove that the $S$-functional calculus is able to create spectral projections. In order to do this, we remove another assumption usually made: we do not assume that admissible functions are defined on slice domains. Instead, we also consider functions that are defined on not necessarily connected sets. This leads to an unexpected phenomenon: the $S$-functional calculi for left and right slice hyperholomorphic functions become inconsistent and give different operators for functions that are both left and right slice hyperholomorphic. We show that any such function is the sum of a locally constant and an intrinsic function. For intrinsic functions both functional calculi agree, but for locally constant functions they must give different operators unless any spectral projection commutes with arbitrary scalars.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.