Paper detail

A different NMR view of cuprate superconductors

Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) is a powerful quantum probe, but the early conclusions on the physics of the cuprates, based on a limited set of data, have to be revised in view of recent findings and results from extensive literature analyses of most NMR data. These show two coupled electronic spin components that influence the nuclei, most easily seen with the planar Cu shift anisotropy. One component is spin from the recently identified ubiquitous metallic excitations, the other due to the intrinsic, antiferromagnetically coupled electronic Cu spin. Both components and its intricate interaction leave their imprint on nuclear shifts and relaxation. They also show a family dependence seen in the charge sharing between planar Cu and O. The main phenomena of the doping and temperature dependences of the interplay between both spins components are discussed in terms of an apparent phenomenology that awaits explanation from theory.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.