Paper detail

A dichotomy theorem for conservative general-valued CSPs

We study the complexity of valued constraint satisfaction problems (VCSP). A problem from VCSP is characterised by a \emph{constraint language}, a fixed set of cost functions over a finite domain. An instance of the problem is specified by a sum of cost functions from the language and the goal is to minimise the sum. We consider the case of so-called \emph{conservative} languages; that is, languages containing all unary cost functions, thus allowing arbitrary restrictions on the domains of the variables. We prove a Schaefer-like dichotomy theorem for this case: if all cost functions in the language satisfy a certain condition (specified by a complementary combination of \emph{STP and MJN multimorphisms}) then any instance can be solved in polynomial time by the algorithm of Kolmogorov and Zivny (arXiv:1008.3104v1), otherwise the language is NP-hard. This generalises recent results of Takhanov (STACS'10) who considered $\{0,\infty\}$-valued languages containing additionally all finite-valued unary cost functions, and Kolmogorov and Zivny (arXiv:1008.1555v1) who considered \emph{finite-valued} conservative languages.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.