Paper detail

A detailed view of filaments and sheets in the warm-hot intergalactic medium. I. Pancake formation

Numerical simulations predict a considerable fraction of the missing baryons at redshift z ~ 0 resting in the so called warm-hot intergalactic medium (WHIM). The filaments and sheets of the WHIM have high temperatures 10^5 - 10^7 K) and a high degree of ionization while having only low to intermediate densities. The particular physical conditions of the WHIM structures, e.g. density and temperature profiles, velocity fields, are expected to leave their special imprint on spectroscopic observations. In order to get further insight into these conditions, we perform hydrodynamical simulations of the WHIM. Instead of analyzing large simulations of cosmological structure formation, we simulate particular well-defined structures and study the impact of different physical processes as well as of the scale dependencies. We start with the comprehensive study of the one-dimensional collapse (pancake) and examine the influence of radiative cooling, heating due to an UV background, and thermal conduction. We investigate the effect of small scale perturbations given according to the initial cosmological power spectrum. If the initial perturbation length scale L exceeds ~ 2 Mpc the collapse leads to shock confined structures. As a result of radiative cooling and of heating due to an UV background a relatively cold and dense core forms in the one-dimensional case. The properties of the core (extension, density, and temperature) are correlated with L. For larger L the core sizes are more concentrated. Thermal conduction enhances this trend and may even result in an evaporation of the core. Our estimates predict that a core may start to evaporate for perturbation lengths larger than L ~ 30 Mpc. The obtained detailed profiles for density and temperature for prototype WHIM structures allow for the determination of possible spectral signatures by the WHIM.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.