Paper detail

A detailed non-LTE analysis of LB-1: Revised parameters and surface abundances

LB-1 has recently been proposed to be a binary system at 4 kpc consisting of a B star of 8 Msol and a massive stellar black hole of 70 Msol. This finding challenges our current theories of massive star evolution and formation of BHs at solar metallicity. Our objective is to derive the effective temperature, surface gravity and chemical composition of the B-type component in order to determine its nature and evolutionary status and, indirectly, to constrain the mass of the BH. We use the non-LTE stellar atmosphere code FASTWIND to analyse new and archival high resolution data. We determine (Teff, logg) values of (14000$\pm500$ K, 3.50$\pm0.15$ dex) that, combined with the Gaia parallax, implies a spectroscopic mass, from logg, of $3.2^{+2.1}_{-1.9}$ Msol and an evolutionary mass, assuming single star evolution, of $5.2^{+0.3}_{-0.6}$ Msol. We determine an upper limit of 8 km/s for the projected rotational velocity and derive the surface abundances, finding the star to have a silicon abundance below solar, to be significantly enhanced in nitrogen and iron, and depleted in carbon and magnesium. Complementary evidence derived from a photometric extinction analysis and Gaia yields similar results for Teff and logg and a consistent distance around 2~kpc. We propose that the B star is a slightly evolved main sequence star of 3-5 Msol with surface abundances reminiscent of diffusion in late B/A chemically peculiar stars with low rotational velocities. There is also evidence for CN-processed material in its atmosphere. These conclusions rely critically on the distance inferred from the Gaia parallax. The goodness of fit of the Gaia astrometry also favours a high-inclination orbit. If the orbit is edge-on and the B star has a mass of 3-5 Msol, the mass of the dark companion would be 4-5 Msol, which would be easier to explain with our current stellar evolutionary models.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access11 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.