Paper detail

A detailed analysis of the high resolution X-ray spectra of NGC 3516: Variability of the ionized absorbers

We re-analyzed the 9 observations performed on 2006 by XMM-Newton and Chandra in the 0.3 to 10 keV energy band of NGC 3516 (Seyfert 1.5). The best fit model of these observations consists of a continuum emission absorbed by four ionized components and ten narrow emission lines. Three ionized absorbing components produce features in the soft X-ray band. The fourth ionization component produces FeXXV-XXVI in the hard- energy band. We study the absorbers time response to well detect changes in the X-ray luminosity of this source, only two components show clear opacity changes consistent with gas close to photoionization equilibrium. The other two components do not seem to respond to continuum variations. This response time allows us to constrain their location. One outflowing component must be located within the obscuring torus, at a distance 2.7X10^17 cm from the central engine, likely originated in the accretion disk. The three remaining outflowing components are at distances larger than 10^{16-17} cm. Two of them have similar outflow velocities and locations, these may be in pressure equilibrium, forming a multi-phase medium, if the gas has metallicity larger than the solar one (5 times). We find no correlation between the change in covering factor of the absorbers and the flux of the source. This, in connection with the observed variability of the ionized absorbers, suggests that the changes in flux are not produced by this material. If the variations are indeed produced by obscuring clumps of gas, these must be located much closer in to the central source.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.