Paper detail

A descriptive Main Gap Theorem

Answering one of the main questions of [FHK14, Chapter 7], we show that there is a tight connection between the depth of a classifiable shallow theory $T$ and the Borel rank of the isomorphism relation $\cong^κ_T$ on its models of size $κ$, for $κ$ any cardinal satisfying $κ^{< κ} = κ> 2^{\aleph_0}$. This is achieved by establishing a link between said rank and the $\mathcal{L}_{\infty κ}$-Scott height of the $κ$-sized models of $T$, and yields to the following descriptive set-theoretical analogue of Shelah&#39;s Main Gap Theorem: Given a countable complete first-order theory $T$, either $\cong^κ_T$ is Borel with a countable Borel rank (i.e. very simple, given that the length of the relevant Borel hierarchy is $κ^+ > \aleph_1$), or it is not Borel at all. The dividing line between the two situations is the same as in Shelah&#39;s theorem, namely that of classifiable shallow theories. We also provide a Borel reducibility version of the above theorem, discuss some limitations to the possible (Borel) complexities of $\cong^κ_T$, and provide a characterization of categoricity of $T$ in terms of the descriptive set-theoretical complexity of $\cong^κ_T$.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.