Paper detail

A density functional theory based direct comparison of coherent tunnelling and electron hopping in redox-active single molecule junctions

For defining the conductance of single molecule junctions with a redox functionality in an electrochemical cell, two conceptually different electron transport mechanisms, namely coherent tunnelling and vibrationally induced hopping compete with each other, where implicit parameters of the setup such as the length of the molecule and the applied gate voltage decide which mechanism is the dominant one. Although coherent tunnelling is most efficiently described within Landauer theory, while the common theoretical treatment of electron hopping is based on Marcus theory, both theories are adequate for the processes they describe without introducing accuracy limiting approximations. For a direct comparison, however, it has to be ensured that the crucial quantities obtained from electronic structure calculations, i.e. the transmission function T(E) in Landauer theory, and the transfer integral V, the reorganisation energy $λ$ and the driving force $ΔG^0$ in Marcus theory, are derived from similar grounds as pointed out by Nitzan and co-workers in a series of publications. In this article our framework is a single particle picture, where we perform density functional theory calculations for the conductance corresponding to both transport mechanisms for junctions with the central molecule containing one, two or three Ruthenium centers, respectively, where we extrapolate our results in order to define the critical length for the transition point of the two regimes which we identify at 5.76 nm for this type of molecular wire. We also discuss trends in dependence on an electrochemically induced gate potential.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.