Paper detail

A Delay Optimal MAC and Packet Scheduler for Heterogeneous M2M Uplink

The uplink data arriving at the Machine-to-Machine (M2M) Application Server (AS) via M2M Aggregators (MAs) is fairly heterogeneous along several dimensions such as maximum tolerable packet delay, payload size and arrival rate, thus necessitating the design of Quality-of-Service (QoS) aware packet scheduler. In this paper, we classify the M2M uplink data into multiple QoS classes and use sigmoidal function to map the delay requirements of each class onto utility functions. We propose a proportionally fair delay-optimal multiclass packet scheduler at AS that maximizes a system utility metric. We note that the average class delay under any work-conserving scheduling policy can be realized by appropriately time-sharing between all possible preemptive priority policies. Therefore the optimal scheduler is determined using an iterative process to determine the optimal time-sharing between all priority scheduling policies, such that it results in maximum system utility. The proposed scheduler can be implemented online with reduced complexity due to the iterative optimization process. We then extend this work to determine jointly optimal MA-AS channel allocation and packet scheduling scheme at the MAs and AS. We first formulate a joint optimization problem that is solved centrally at the AS and then propose a low complexity distributed optimization problem solved independently at MAs and AS. We show that the distributed optimization solution converges quickly to the centralized optimization result with minimal information exchange overhead between MAs and AS. Using Monte-Carlo simulations, we verify the optimality of the proposed scheduler and show that it outperforms other state-of-the-art packet schedulers such as weighted round robin, max-weight scheduler etc. Another desirable feature of proposed scheduler is low delay jitter for delay-sensitive traffic.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.