Paper detail

A Definitive Survey for Lyman Limit Systems at z~3.5 with the Sloan Digital Sky Survey

We perform a semi-automated survey for tau>=2 Lyman Limit systems (LLSs) in quasar spectra from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, Data Release 7. From a starting sample of 2473 quasars with zem=3.6-4.4, we analyze 469 spectra meeting strict seletion criteria for a total redshift path Dz=93.8 and identify 192 intervening systems at z>3.3. The incidence of tau>=2 LLSs per unit redshift, l(z), is well described by a single-power law at these redshifts: l(z) = C_LLS [(1+z)/(1+z_*)]^gamma, with z_*=3.7, C_LLS = 1.9+/-0.2, and gamma = 5.2+/-1.5 (68% c.l.). These values are systematically lower than previous estimates (especially at z<4) but are consistent with recent measurements of the mean free path to ionizing radiation. Extrapolations of this power-law to z=0 are inconsistent with previous estimations of l(z) at z<1 and suggest a break at z~2, similar to that observed for the Lya forest. Our results also indicate that the systems giving rise to LLS absorption decrease by ~50% in comoving number density and/or physical size from z=4 to 3.3, perhaps due to an enhanced extragalactic ultraviolet background. The observations place an integral constraint on the HI frequency distribution f(N_HI,X) and indicate that the power-law slope beta= dln[f(N,X)]/dln[N] is likely shallower than beta = -1 at N_HI=10^18 cm^-2. Including other constraints on f(N_HI,X) from the literature, we infer that beta is steeper than beta = -1.7 at N_HI~10^15 cm^-2, implying at least two inflections in f(N_HI,X). We also perform a survey for proximate LLSs (PLLSs) and find that l(z)_PLLS is systematically lower ~25% than intervening systems. Finally, we estimate that systematic effects impose an uncertainty of 10-20% in the l(z) measurements; these effects may limit the precision of all future surveys.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.