Paper detail

A deep ROSAT Survey - XIV. X-ray emission from faint galaxies

We present a cross-correlation analysis to constrain the faint galaxy contribution to the cosmic X-ray background (XRB). Cross-correlating faint optical galaxy catalogues with unidentified X-ray sources from 3 deep ROSAT fields we find that B < 23 galaxies account for 20+-7 % of all X-ray sources to a flux limit of S(0.5-2.0 keV)=4x10^{-15} erg s-1 cm-2. To probe deeper, galaxies are then cross-correlated with the remaining unresolved X-ray images. A highly significant signal is obtained on each field. Allowing for the effect of the ROSAT point-spread function, and deconvolving the effect of galaxy clustering, we find that faint B < 23 galaxies directly account for 23+-3% of the unresolved XRB at 1keV. Using the optical magnitude of faint galaxies as probes of their redshift distribution, we find evidence for strong evolution in their X-ray luminosity, parameterised with the form L_x \propto (1+z)^3.2+-1.0. Extrapolation to z=2 will account for 40+-10% of the total XRB at 1keV. The nature of the emitting mechanism in these galaxies remains unclear, but we argue that obscured and/or low luminosity AGN provide the most natural explanation.

preprint1997arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.