Paper detail

A deep ROSAT Survey X: X-ray Luminous Narrow Emission Line Galaxies

X-ray luminous narrow emision-line galaxies (NELG) have been previously identified and proposed as an important class of extragalactic X-ray sources, with a potentially significant contribution to the total extragalactic X-ray flux at energies below $\sim$ 10 keV. In order to investigate and clarify this possibility, we have used a sample of NELG found in 5 deep ROSAT fields and similar samples belonging to the Cambridge-Cambridge ROSAT Serendipity Survey and to the {\it Einstein} Observatory Extended Medium Sensitivity Survey sample. The principal results of this investigation are as follows: a) for a given optical luminosity, the typical X-ray luminosity of NELGs is about one or two orders of magnitude higher than that of normal galaxies; b) the ratio of the surface density of NELGs compared with BLAGN increases from about 0.04 at fx >= 6 x 10^{-13} erg cm^{-2} s^{-1} to about 0.1 at fx >= 10^{-14} erg cm^{-2} s^{-1}, suggesting that the surface density of NL galaxies might be very close to that of BLAGN at fx ~ 10^{-15} erg cm^{-2} s^{-1}; c) we find that these objects are described by a cosmological evolution rate similar to that of soft X-ray selected BLAGN; d) the de-evolved (z=0) XLF of NELGs in the luminosity range 10^{41} - 5 x 10^{43} erg s^{-1} is steeper than the BLAGN (z=0) XLF in the same luminosity interval. Their spatial density is significantly lower than the spatial density of X-ray selected BLAGN at Lx(z=0) ~ 5 x 10^{43} erg s^{-1}, but this difference decreases at lower luminosities such that at Lx(z=0) < 10^{42} erg s^{-1} the spatial density of NELGs is very close to that of BLAGN. The implications of these results for the contribution of this class of objects to the cosmic X-ray background are discussed.

preprint1996arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.