Paper detail

A Deep Narrowband Imaging Search for CIV and He II Emission from Ly$α$ Blobs

We conduct a deep narrow-band imaging survey of 13 Ly$α$ blobs (LABs) located in the SSA22 proto-cluster at z~3.1 in the CIV and HeII emission lines in an effort to constrain the physical process powering the Ly$α$ emission in LABs. Our observations probe down to unprecedented surface brightness limits of 2.1 $-$ 3.4 $\times$ 10$^{-18}$ erg s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$ arcsec$^{-2}$ per 1 arcsec$^2$ aperture (5$σ$) for the HeII$λ$1640 and CIV$λ$1549 lines, respectively. We do not detect extended HeII and CIV emission in any of the LABs, placing strong upper limits on the HeII/Ly$α$ and CIV/Ly$α$ line ratios, of 0.11 and 0.16, for the brightest two LABs in the field. We conduct detailed photoionization modeling of the expected line ratios and find that, although our data constitute the deepest ever observations of these lines, they are still not deep enough to rule out a scenario where the Ly$α$ emission is powered by the ionizing luminosity of an obscured AGN. Our models can accommodate HeII/Ly$α$ and CIV/Ly$α$ ratios as low as $\simeq$0.05 and $\simeq$0.07 respectively, implying that one needs to reach surface brightness as low as 1 $-$ 1.5 $\times$ 10$^{-18}$ erg s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$ arcsec$^{-2}$ (at 5$σ$) in order to rule out a photoionization scenario. These depths will be achievable with the new generation of image-slicing integral field units such as VLT/MUSE or Keck/KCWI. We also model the expected HeII/Ly$α$ and CIV/Ly$α$ in a different scenario, where Ly$α$ emission is powered by shocks generated in a large-scale superwind, but find that our observational constraints can only be met for shock velocities $v_{\rm s} \gtrsim$ 250 km s$^{-1}$, which appear to be in conflict with recent observations of quiescent kinematics in LABs.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.