Paper detail

A Deep Learning Model with Radiomics Analysis Integration for Glioblastoma Post-Resection Survival Prediction

Purpose: To develop a novel deep-learning model that integrates radiomics analysis in a multi-dimensional feature fusion workflow for glioblastoma (GBM) post-resection survival prediction. Methods: A cohort of 235 GBM patients with complete surgical resection was divided into short-term/long-term survival groups with 1-yr survival time threshold. Each patient received a pre-surgery multi-parametric MRI exam, and three tumor subregions were segmented by neuroradiologists. The developed model comprises three data source branches: in the 1st radiomics branch, 456 radiomics features (RF) were from each patient; in the 2nd deep learning branch, an encoding neural network architecture was trained for survival group prediction using each single MR modality, and high-dimensional parameters of the last two network layers were extracted as deep features (DF). The extracted radiomics features and deep features were processed by a feature selection procedure to reduce dimension size of each feature space. In the 3rd branch, non-image-based patient-specific clinical features (PSCF) were collected. Finally, data sources from all three branches were fused as an integrated input for a supporting vector machine (SVM) execution for survival group prediction. Different strategies of model design, including 1) 2D/3D-based image analysis, and 2) different data source combinations in SVM input design, were investigated in comparison studies. Results: The model achieved 0.638 prediction accuracy when using PSCF only, which was higher than the results using RF or DF only in both 2D and 3D analysis. The joint use of RF/PSCF improved accuracy results to 0.681 in 3D analysis. The most accurate models in 2D/3D analysis reached the highest accuracy 0.745 with different combinations of RF/DF/ PSCF, and the corresponding ROC AUC results were 0.69(2D) and 0.71(3D), respectively.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.