Paper detail

A Deep learning Approach to Generate Contrast-Enhanced Computerised Tomography Angiography without the Use of Intravenous Contrast Agents

Contrast-enhanced computed tomography angiograms (CTAs) are widely used in cardiovascular imaging to obtain a non-invasive view of arterial structures. However, contrast agents are associated with complications at the injection site as well as renal toxicity leading to contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) and renal failure. We hypothesised that the raw data acquired from a non-contrast CT contains sufficient information to differentiate blood and other soft tissue components. We utilised deep learning methods to define the subtleties between soft tissue components in order to simulate contrast enhanced CTAs without contrast agents. Twenty-six patients with paired non-contrast and CTA images were randomly selected from an approved clinical study. Non-contrast axial slices within the AAA from 10 patients (n = 100) were sampled for the underlying Hounsfield unit (HU) distribution at the lumen, intra-luminal thrombus and interface locations. Sampling of HUs in these regions revealed significant differences between all regions (p<0.001 for all comparisons), confirming the intrinsic differences in the radiomic signatures between these regions. To generate a large training dataset, paired axial slices from the training set (n=13) were augmented to produce a total of 23,551 2-D images. We trained a 2-D Cycle Generative Adversarial Network (cycleGAN) for this non-contrast to contrast (NC2C) transformation task. The accuracy of the cycleGAN output was assessed by comparison to the contrast image. This pipeline is able to differentiate between visually incoherent soft tissue regions in non-contrast CT images. The CTAs generated from the non-contrast images bear strong resemblance to the ground truth. Here we describe a novel application of Generative Adversarial Network for CT image processing. This is poised to disrupt clinical pathways requiring contrast enhanced CT imaging.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.