Paper detail

A Deduction from Dirac Sea Model

Whether the Dirac sea model is right is verifiable. Assuming the Dirac sea is a physical reality, we have one imagination that a negative energy particle(s) in the sea and a usual positive energy particle(s) will form a neutral atom. The features of the atom can be studied using the nonrelativistic reduction of the Bethe-Salpeter equation, especially for a two body system. This work is dedicated to discuss the bound state of spin-0 and spin-$\frac{\displaystyle 1}{\displaystyle 2}$ constituents. The study shows that an atom consisting of a negative energy particle $(e^-$ or $hc)$ and a positive energy particle $(u\overline{d}$ or $hc)$ has some features of a neutrino, such as spin, lepton number and oscillation. One deduction is that if the atom is a real particle, an atom $X$ consisting of two negative energy particles and a nucleus with double charges exists in nature, which can be observed in Strangeonium, Charmonium and Bottomonium decays $[s\overline{s}]$, $[c\overline{c}]$ and $[b\overline{b}]\rightarrow X π^-π^- e^+e^+~+~hc$ with $X$ invisible at KLOE, CLEOc, BESIII, Belle and BaBar.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.