Paper detail

A Decade-long Landscape of Advanced Persistent Threats: Longitudinal Analysis and Global Trends

An advanced persistent threat (APT) refers to a covert, long-term cyberattack, typically conducted by state-sponsored actors, targeting critical sectors and often remaining undetected for long periods. In response, collective intelligence from around the globe collaborates to identify and trace surreptitious activities, generating substantial documentation on APT campaigns publicly available on the web. While prior works predominantly focus on specific aspects of APT cases, such as detection, evaluation, cyber threat intelligence, and dataset creation, limited attention has been devoted to revisiting and investigating these scattered dossiers in a longitudinal manner. The objective of our study is to fill the gap by offering a macro perspective, connecting key insights and global trends in past APT attacks. We systematically analyze six reliable sources-three focused on technical reports and another three on threat actors-examining 1,509 APT dossiers (24,215 pages) spanning 2014-2023, and identifying 603 unique APT groups worldwide. To efficiently unearth relevant information, we employ a hybrid methodology that combines rule-based information retrieval with large-language-model-based search techniques. Our longitudinal analysis reveals shifts in threat actor activities, global attack vectors, changes in targeted sectors, and relationships between cyberattacks and significant events such as elections or wars, which provide insights into historical patterns in APT evolution. Over the past decade, 154 countries have been affected, primarily using malicious documents and spear phishing as dominant initial infiltration vectors, with a noticeable decline in zero-day exploitation since 2016. Furthermore, we present our findings through interactive visualization tools, such as an APT map or flow diagram, to facilitate intuitive understanding of global patterns and trends in APT activities.

preprint2026arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.