Paper detail

A Dataset and Benchmark for Mesh Parameterization

UV parameterization is a core task in computer graphics, with applications in mesh texturing, remeshing, mesh repair, mesh editing, and more. It is thus an active area of research, which has led to a wide variety of parameterization methods that excel according to different measures of quality. There is no single metric capturing parameterization quality in practice, since the quality of a parameterization heavily depends on its application; hence, parameterization methods can best be judged by the actual users of the computed result. In this paper, we present a dataset of meshes together with UV maps collected from various sources and intended for real-life use. Our dataset can be used to test parameterization methods in realistic environments. We also introduce a benchmark to compare parameterization methods with artist-provided UV parameterizations using a variety of metrics. This strategy enables us to evaluate the performance of a parameterization method by computing the quality indicators that are valued by the designers of a mesh.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.