Paper detail

A cubical Squier's theorem

Convergent rewriting systems are well-known tools in the study of the word-rewriting problem. In particular, a presentation of a monoid by a finite convergent rewriting system gives an algorithm to decide the word problem for this monoid. Squier proved that there exists a finitely presented monoid whose word problem was decidable but which did not admit a finite convergent presentation. To do so, Squier constructed, for any convergent presentation $(G,R)$ of a monoid $M$, a set of syzygies $S$ corresponding to relations between the relations. This construction was later extended into the construction of a polygraphic resolution $Σ$ of $M$, whose first dimensions coincide with Squier's construction $(G,R,S)$. However, the construction of the polygraphic resolution has proved to be too complicated to be effectively computed on non-trivial examples. Cubical categories appear to be a promising framework where Squier's theorem and the construction of the polygraphic resolution would be more straightforward. This paper is the first step towards this goal. We start by defining the notion of $(2,k)$-cubical categories. We then adapt some classical notions of word rewriting to this cubical setting. Finally, we express and prove a cubical version of Squier's theorem.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.