Paper detail

A Cross-Domain Approach for Continuous Impression Recognition from Dyadic Audio-Visual-Physio Signals

The impression we make on others depends not only on what we say, but also, to a large extent, on how we say it. As a sub-branch of affective computing and social signal processing, impression recognition has proven critical in both human-human conversations and spoken dialogue systems. However, most research has studied impressions only from the signals expressed by the emitter, ignoring the response from the receiver. In this paper, we perform impression recognition using a proposed cross-domain architecture on the dyadic IMPRESSION dataset. This improved architecture makes use of cross-domain attention and regularization. The cross-domain attention consists of intra- and inter-attention mechanisms, which capture intra- and inter-domain relatedness, respectively. The cross-domain regularization includes knowledge distillation and similarity enhancement losses, which strengthen the feature connections between the emitter and receiver. The experimental evaluation verified the effectiveness of our approach. Our approach achieved a concordance correlation coefficient of 0.770 in competence dimension and 0.748 in warmth dimension.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.