Paper detail

A critical study of the elastic properties and stability of Heusler compounds: Cubic Co$_{2}YZ$ compounds with $L2_{1}$ structure

Elastic constants and their derived properties of various cubic Heusler compounds were calculated using first-principles density functional theory. To begin with, Cu$_2$MnAl is used as a case study to explain the interpretation of the basic quantities and compare them with experiments. The main part of the work focuses on Co$_2$-based compounds that are Co$_2$Mn$M$ with the main group elements $M=$~Al, Ga, In, Si, Ge, Sn, Pb, Sb, Bi, and Co$_2TM$ with the main group elements Si or Ge, and the $3d$ transition metals $T=$~Sc, Ti, V, Cr, Mn, and Fe. It is found that many properties of Heusler compounds correlate to the mass or nuclear charge $Z$ of the main group element. Blackman's and Every's diagrams are used to compare the elastic properties of the materials, whereas Pugh's and Poisson's ratios are used to analyze the relationship between interatomic bonding and physical properties. It is found that the {\it Pugh's criterion} on brittleness needs to be revised whereas {\it Christensen's criterion} describes the ductile--brittle transition of Heusler compounds very well. The calculated elastic properties give hint on a metallic bonding with an intermediate brittleness for the studied Heusler compounds. The universal anisotropy of the stable compounds has values in the range of $0.57 <A_U <2.73$. The compounds with higher $A_U$ values are found close to the middle of the transition metal series. In particular, Co$_2$ScAl with $A_U=0.01$ is predicted to be an isotropic material that comes closest to an ideal Cauchy solid as compared to the remaining Co$_2$-based compounds. Apart from the elastic constants and moduli, the sound velocities, Debye temperatures, and hardness are predicted and discussed for the studied systems. The calculated slowness surfaces for sound waves reflect the degree of anisotropy of the compounds.

preprint2017arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.