Paper detail

A critical regularity condition on the angular velocity of axially symmetric Navier-Stokes equations

Let $v$ be the velocity of Leray-Hopf solutions to the axially symmetric three-dimensional Navier-Stokes equations. It is shown that $v$ is regular if the angular velocity $v_θ$ satisfies an integral condition which is critical under the standard scaling. This condition allows functions satisfying \[ |v_θ(x, t)| \le \frac{C}{r |\ln r|^{2+ε}}, \quad r<1/2, \] where $r$ is the distance from $x$ to the axis, $C$ and $ε$ are any positive constants. Comparing with the critical a priori bound \[ |v_θ(x, t)| \le \frac{C}{r}, \qquad 0< r \le 1/2, \]our condition is off by the log factor $|\ln r|^{2+ε}$ at worst. This is inspired by the recent interesting paper \cite{CFZ:1} where H. Chen, D. Y. Fang and T. Zhang establish, among other things, an almost critical regularity condition on the angular velocity. Previous regularity conditions are off by a factor $r^{-1}$. The proof is based on the new observation that, when viewed differently, all the vortex stretching terms in the 3 dimensional axially symmetric Navier-Stokes equations are critical instead of supercritical as commonly believed.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.