Paper detail

A critical investigation on the discrepancy between the observational and theoretical Red Giant luminosity function "Bump"

New theoretical evaluations of the RGB luminosity function 'bump' and the ZAHB luminosity covering the range of metallicities typical of galactic globular cluster are presented. The variation of the theoretical RGB bump and ZAHB levels due to the metallicity, original helium content, mixing length value, age, mass loss, bolometric corrections, opacities and equation of state adopted in the evolutionary models is also discussed. These new prescriptions have been taken into account for casting light on a longstanding astrophysical problem connected with the Red Giant Branch evolutionary phase, namely the discrepancy between the observational and the theoretical luminosity of RGB bump. A sample of globular clusters with accurate evaluations of the bump luminosity and spectroscopical metallicity determinations has been selected. The Zero Age Horizontal Branch luminosity at the RR-Lyrae instability strip has been evaluated as accurately as possible, and the observational luminosity difference between the RGB bump and the ZAHB has been compared with the theoretical values. It is shown that there is no significant disagreement between observations and canonical stellar models. The possible applications of this result are also briefly discussed.

preprint1997arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.