Paper detail

A critical evaluation of bipartite entanglement and steering measures in a genuinely tripartite entangled system

A large number of inequalities have been proposed for the detection of bipartite continuous variable entanglement and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering. Many of these are based on either measured or inferred variances and are relatively easily measured via homodyne detection of optical outputs. In this work we examine a number of bipartite inequalities in the process of cascaded downconversion and sum-frequency generation inside an optical cavity. This has previously been predicted to be a potential source of continuous-variable tripartite entanglement, therefore we know that there are no separable bipartitions. In this work we investigate the performance of the chosen inequalities in the stable, below threshold regime. We show that detection of the existing entanglement is sensitive to the actual inequalities chosen, with some criteria missing it completely. Our results are explained by the fact that violation of the chosen inequalities is sufficient but not necessary to demonstrate the non-classical relationships between the modes, and highlights the outstanding problem of developing a reliable continuous-variable entanglement measure.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.