Paper detail

A critical analysis of models and experimental evidence of negative capacitance stabilization in a ferroelectric by capacitance matching to an adjacent dielectric layer

We present a thorough analysis of the foundations of models of stabilization of negative capacitance (NC) in a ferroelectric (FE) layer by capacitance matching to a dielectric layer, which claim that the FE is stabilized in a low polarization state without FE polarization switching (non-switching), showing that the concept is fundamentally flawed and unphysical. We also analyze experimental evidence concluding that there is no data supporting the need to invoke such stabilization; rather, conventional models of ferroelectric polarization switching suffice to account for the effects observed. We analyze experimental evidence that at least in some of the model systems for which this effect has been claimed, categorically rule out stabilized non-switching NC. Microscopic measurements recently published as supporting non-switching stabilized NC actually rule them out, since the ferroelectric in a stack sandwiched between two dielectric layers was found to be in a mixed domain state (high polarizations within each domain) rather than in the low polarization state predicted by non-switching stabilized NC models. Nonetheless, since stabilized NC (corresponding to a minimum in free energy) is not physically impossible, it would be useful to move the research efforts to investigating scenarios and systems in which this effect is possible and expected and assess whether they are useful and practical for low power electronics.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.