Paper detail

A criterion to detect line plumes from velocity fields in turbulent convection

We present a simple, new criterion to extract line plumes from the velocity fields, without using the temperature field, in a horizontal plane close to the plate in turbulent convection. The existing coherent structure detection criteria from velocity fields, proposed for shear driven wall turbulence, are first shown to be inadequate for turbulent convection. Based on physical arguments, we then propose that the negative values of $\overline{\nabla_H}\cdot\overline{u}$, the horizontal divergence of the horizontal velocity field extracts the plume regions from the velocity field. The $\overline{\nabla_H}\cdot\overline{u}$ criterion is then shown to predict the total length of plumes correctly over a Rayleigh number range of $7.7\times 10^5\le Ra_w\le 1.43\times 10^9$ and a Prandtl number range of $3.96\le Pr\le 5.3$. The thickness of the plume region predicted by the present criterion is approximately same as that obtained by a threshold of RMS temperature fluctuations, $\sqrt{T'^2}=0.2 ΔT$, where $ΔT$ is the temperature drop across the fluid layer.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.