Paper detail

A CRISPR-Cas-Inspired Mechanism for Detecting Hardware Trojans in FPGA Devices

Hardware security has risen in prominence in recent years with concerns stemming from a globalizing semiconductor supply chain and increased third-party IP (intellectual property) usage. Trojan detection is of paramount importance for ensuring systems with confidentiality, integrity, and availability. Existing methods for hardware Trojan detection in FPGA (field programmable gate array) devices include test-time methods, pre-implementation methods, and run-time methods. The first two methods provide effective ways of detecting some Trojans; however, Trojans may be specifically designed to avoid detection at test-time or before implementation making run-time detection a more attractive option. Run-time detection and removal of Trojans is highly desirable due to the wide range of critical systems which are deployed on FPGAs and may be difficult or costly to remove from operation. Many parallels can be drawn between hardware and natural systems, and one example creates an analogy between hardware attacks and biological attacks. We propose a CRISPR-Cas-inspired (clustered regularly interspaced palindromic repeats) method for detecting hardware Trojans in FPGAs. The fundamental concepts of the Type 1-E CRISPR-Cas mechanism are discussed and simulated to predict the flow of genetic information through this biological system. The basic structure of this system is utilized to propose a novel run-time Trojan detection method titled CADEFT (CRISPR-Cas-based Algorithm for DEtection of FPGA Trojans). Different levels of FPGA application design flow are explored, and CADEFT is proposed for realization at the bitstream level to monitor the configuration bitstream and the run-time properties of the FPGA. The flexibility of CADEFT originates in the CRISPR-Cas mechanism's ability to recognize similar albeit previously unseen patterns which may pose a threat to the system.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.