Paper detail

A CP-violating phase in a two Higgs triplet scenario : some phenomenological implications

We consider a scenario where, along with the usual Higgs doublet, two scalar triplets are present. The extension of the triplet sector is required for the Type~II mechanism for the generation of neutrino masses, if this mechanism has to generate a neutrino mass matrix with two-zero texture. One CP-violating phase has been retained in the scalar potential of the model, and all parameters have been chosen consistently with the observed neutrino mass and mixing patterns. We find that a large phase ($\gtrsim 60^{\circ}$) splits the two doubly-charged scalar mass eigenstates wider apart, so that the decay $H_1^{++} \rightarrow H_2^{++} h$ is dominant (with h being the $125$ GeV scalar). We identify a set of benchmark points where this decay dominates. This is complementary to the situation, reported in our earlier work, where the heavier doubly-charged scalar decays as $H_1^{++} \rightarrow H_2^+ W^+$. We point out the rather spectacular signal, ensuing from $H_1^{++} \rightarrow H_2^{++} h$, in the form of Higgs plus same-sign dilepton peak, which can be observed at the Large Hadron Collider.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.