Paper detail

A Counterexample and Fix to a Minimum Distance Duality Theorem

We consider dual optimization problems to the fundamental problem of finding the minimum distance from a point to a subspace. We provide a counterexample to a theorem which has appeared in the literature, relating the minimum distance problem to a maximization problem in the predual space. The theorem was stated in a series of papers by Zames and Owen in the early 1990s in conjunction with a non-standard definition, which together are true, but the theorem is false when assuming standard definitions, as it would later appear. Reasons for the failure of this theorem are discussed; in particular, the fact that the Hahn-Banach Theorem cannot be guaranteed to provide an extension which is an element of the predual space. The condition needed to restore the theorem is derived; namely, that the annihilator of the pre-annihilator return the original subspace of interest. This condition is consistent with the non-standard definition initially used, and it is further shown to be necessary in a sense.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.