Paper detail

A cosmological exclusion plot: Towards model-independent constraints on modified gravity from current and future growth rate data

Most cosmological constraints on modified gravity are obtained assuming that the cosmic evolution was standard $Λ$CDM in the past and that the present matter density and power spectrum normalization are the same as in a $Λ$CDM model. Here we examine how the constraints change when these assumptions are lifted. We focus in particular on the parameter $Y$ (also called $G_{\mathrm{eff}}$) that quantifies the deviation from the Poisson equation. This parameter can be estimated by comparing with the model-independent growth rate quantity $fσ_{8}(z)$ obtained through redshift distortions. We reduce the model dependency in evaluating $Y$ by marginalizing over $σ_{8}$ and over the initial conditions, and by absorbing the degenerate parameter $Ω_{m,0}$ into $Y$. We use all currently available values of $fσ_{8}(z)$. We find that the combination $\hat{Y}=YΩ_{m,0}$, assumed constant in the observed redshift range, can be constrained only very weakly by current data, $\hat{Y}=0.28_{-0.23}^{+0.35}$ at 68\% c.l. We also forecast the precision of a future estimation of $\hat{Y}$ in a Euclid-like redshift survey. We find that the future constraints will reduce substantially the uncertainty, $\hat{Y}=0.30_{-0.09}^{+0.08}$ , at 68\% c.l., but the relative error on $\hat{Y}$ around the fiducial remains quite high, of the order of 30\%. The main reason for these weak constraints is that $\hat{Y}$ is strongly degenerate with the initial conditions, so that large or small values of $\hat{Y}$ are compensated by choosing non-standard initial values of the derivative of the matter density contrast. Finally, we produce a forecast of a cosmological exclusion plot on the Yukawa strength and range parameters, which complements similar plots on laboratory scales but explores scales and epochs reachable only with large-scale galaxy surveys. (abridged)

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.