Paper detail

A Cosmic Coincidence: The Power-Law Galaxy Correlation Function

We model the evolution of galaxy clustering through cosmic time to investigate the nature of the power-law shape of xi(r), the galaxy two-point correlation function. Departures from a power law are mainly governed by galaxy pair counts on small scales, subject to non-linear dynamics. We assume that galaxies reside within dark matter halos and subhalos and use a semi-analytic substructure evolution model to study subhalo populations within host halos. We find that tidal mass loss and, to a lesser degree, dynamical friction deplete the number of subhalos within larger host halos over time by ~90%, just the right amount for achieving a power-law xi(r) at z = 0. We find that xi(r) breaks from a power law at high masses, implying that only galaxies of luminosities <= Lstar should exhibit power-law clustering. We also demonstrate that xi(r) evolves from being far from a power law at high redshift, toward a near power law at z = 0 and deviates in the future. This is mainly caused by the evolving competition between the accretion and destruction rates of subhalos, which happen to strike just the right balance at z~0. We show that key ingredients determining the shape of xi(r) are the fraction of galaxies that are satellites, the relative difference in mass between the halos of isolated galaxies and halos that contain a single satellite on average, and the rareness of halos that host galaxies. These pieces are intertwined and we find no simple, universal rule for which a power-law xi(r) will occur. However, we do show that the physics responsible for setting the galaxy content of halos do not care about the conditions needed to achieve a power law xi(r) and these conditions are met only in a narrow mass and redshift range. We conclude that the power-law nature of xi(r) for Lstar and fainter galaxy samples at low redshift is a cosmic coincidence. (Abridged)

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.