Paper detail

A Correlation Between Galaxy Morphology and MgII Halo Absorption Strength

(Abridged) We compared the quantified morphological properties of 37 intermediate redshift MgII absorption selected galaxies to the properties of the absorbing halo gas, observed in the spectra of background quasars. The galaxy morphologies were measured using GIM2D modeling of Hubble Space Telescope WFPC-2 images and the absorbing gas properties were obtained from HIRES/Keck and UVES/VLT quasar spectra. We found a 3.1 sigma correlation between galaxy morphological asymmetries normalized by the quasar-galaxy projected separations, A/D, and the MgII rest-frame equivalent widths. Saturation effects cause increased scatter in the relationship with increasing W_r(2796). We defined a subsample for which the fraction of saturated pixels in the absorption profiles is f_sat<0.5. The correlation strengthened to 3.3 sigma. We also find a paucity of small morphological asymmetries for galaxies selected by MgII absorption as compared to those of the general population of field galaxies, as measured in the Medium Deep Survey. The K-S probability that the two samples are drawn from the same galaxy population is ruled out at a 99.8% confidence level. The A/D-W_r(2796) correlation suggests a connection between the processes that perturb galaxies and the quantity of gas in their halos, normalized by the impact parameter. Since the perturbations are minor, it is clear that dramatic processes or events are not required for a galaxy to have an extended halo; the galaxies appear &#34;normal&#34;. We suggest that common, more mild processes that populate halos with gas, such as satellite galaxy merging, accretion of the local cosmic web, and longer-range galaxy-galaxy interactions, consequently also induce the observed minor perturbations in the galaxies.

preprint2007arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.