Paper detail

A Correctness Result for Online Robust PCA

This work studies the problem of sequentially recovering a sparse vector $x_t$ and a vector from a low-dimensional subspace $l_t$ from knowledge of their sum $m_t = x_t + l_t$. If the primary goal is to recover the low-dimensional subspace where the $l_t$'s lie, then the problem is one of online or recursive robust principal components analysis (PCA). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first correctness result for online robust PCA. We prove that if the $l_t$'s obey certain denseness and slow subspace change assumptions, and the support of $x_t$ changes by at least a certain amount at least every so often, and some other mild assumptions hold, then with high probability, the support of $x_t$ will be recovered exactly, and the error made in estimating $x_t$ and $l_t$ will be small. An example of where such a problem might arise is in separating a sparse foreground and slowly changing dense background in a surveillance video.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.