Paper detail

A Corrected and More Efficient Suite of MCMC Samplers for the Multinomal Probit Model

The multinomial probit (MNP) model is a useful tool for describing discrete-choice data and there are a variety of methods for fitting the model. Among them, the algorithms provided by Imai and van Dyk (2005a), based on Marginal Data Augmentation, are widely used, because they are efficient in terms of convergence and allow the possibly improper prior distribution to be specified directly on identifiable parameters. Burgette and Nordheim (2012) modify a model and algorithm of Imai and van Dyk (2005a) to avoid an arbitrary choice that is often made to establish identifiability. There is an error in the algorithms of Imai and van Dyk (2005a), however, which affects both their algorithms and that of Burgette and Nordheim (2012). This error can alter the stationary distribution and the resulting fitted parameters as well as the efficiency of these algorithms. We propose a correction and use both a simulation study and a real-data analysis to illustrate the difference between the original and corrected algorithms, both in terms of their estimated posterior distributions and their convergence properties. In some cases, the effect on the stationary distribution can be substantial.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.