Paper detail

A Constructive Proof of a Concentration Bound for Real-Valued Random Variables

Almost 10 years ago, Impagliazzo and Kabanets (2010) gave a new combinatorial proof of Chernoff's bound for sums of bounded independent random variables. Unlike previous methods, their proof is constructive. This means that it provides an efficient randomized algorithm for the following task: given a set of Boolean random variables whose sum is not concentrated around its expectation, find a subset of statistically dependent variables. However, the algorithm of Impagliazzo and Kabanets (2010) is given only for the Boolean case. On the other hand, the general proof technique works also for real-valued random variables, even though for this case, Impagliazzo and Kabanets (2010) obtain a concentration bound that is slightly suboptimal. Herein, we revisit both these issues and show that it is relatively easy to extend the Impagliazzo-Kabanets algorithm to real-valued random variables and to improve the corresponding concentration bound by a constant factor.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.