Paper detail

A construction principle for ADM-type theories in maximal slicing gauge

The differing concepts of time in general relativity and quantum mechanics are widely accused as the main culprits in our persistent failure in finding a complete theory of quantum gravity. Here we address this issue by constructing ADM-type theories \emph{in a particular time gauge} directly from first principles. The principles are expressed as conditions on phase space constraints: we search for two sets of spatially covariant constraints, which generate symmetries (are first class) and gauge-fix each other leaving two propagating degrees of freedom. One of the sets is the Weyl generator tr$(π)$, and the other is a one-parameter family containing the ADM scalar constraint $λR- β(π^{ab}π_{ab}+(\mbox{tr}(π))^2/2))$. The two sets of constraints can be seen as defining ADM-type theories with a maximal slicing gauge-fixing. This work provides an independent, first principles derivation of ADM gravity. The principles above are motivated by a heuristic argument relying in the relation between symmetry doubling and exact renormalization arguments for quantum gravity, aside from compatibility with the spatial diffeomorphisms. As a by-product, these results address one of the most popular criticisms of Shape Dynamics: its construction starts off from the ADM Hamiltonian formulation. The present work severs this dependence: the set of constraints yield reduced phase space theories that can be naturally represented by either Shape Dynamics or ADM. More precisely, the resulting theories can be naturally "unfixed" to encompass either spatial Weyl invariance (the symmetry of Shape Dynamics) or refoliation symmetry (ADM).

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.