Paper detail

A Constraint Satisfaction Method for Configuring Non-Local Service Interfaces

Modularity and decontextualisation are core principles of a service-oriented architecture. However, the principles are often lost when it comes to an implementation of services, as a result of a rigidly defined service interface. The interface, which defines a data format, is typically specific to a particular context and its change entails significant redevelopment costs. This paper focuses on a two-fold problem. On the one hand, the interface description language must be flexible enough for maintaining service compatibility in a variety of different contexts without modification of the service itself. On the other hand, the composition of interfaces in a distributed environment must be provably consistent. The existing approaches for checking compatibility of service choreographies are either inflexible (WS-CDL and WSCI) or require behaviour specification associated with each service, which is often impossible to provide in practice. We present a novel approach for automatic interface configuration in distributed stream-connected components operating as closed-source services (i.e. the behavioural protocol is unknown). We introduce a Message Definition Language (MDL), which can extend the existing interfaces description languages, such as WSDL, with support of subtyping, inheritance and polymorphism. The MDL supports configuration variables that link input and output interfaces of a service and propagate requirements over an application graph. We present an algorithm that solves the interface reconciliation problem using constraint satisfaction that relies on Boolean satisfiability as a subproblem.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.