Paper detail

A Consistent Spectral Model of WR 136 and its Associated Bubble NGC 6888

We analyse whether a stellar atmosphere model computed with the code CMFGEN provides an optimal description of the stellar observations of WR 136 and simultaneously reproduces the nebular observations of NGC 6888, such as the ionization degree, which is modelled with the pyCloudy code. All the observational material available (far and near UV and optical spectra) were used to constrain such models. We found that even when the stellar luminosity and the mass-loss rate were well constrained, the stellar temperature T_* at tau = 20, can be in a range between 70 000 and 110 000 K. When using the nebula as an additional restriction we found that the stellar models with T_* \sim 70 000 K represent the best solution for both, the star and the nebula. Results from the photoionization model show that if we consider a chemically homogeneous nebula, the observed N^+/O^+ ratios found in different nebular zones can be reproduced, therefore it is not necessary to assume a chemical inhomogeneous nebula. Our work shows the importance of calculating coherent models including stellar and nebular constraints. This allowed us to determine, in a consistent way, all the physical parameters of both the star and its associated nebula. The chemical abundances derived are 12 + log(N/H) = 9.95, 12 + log(C/H) = 7.84 and 12 + log(O/H) = 8.76 for the star and 12 + log(N/H) = 8.40, 12 + log(C/H) = 8.86 and 12 + log(O/H) = 8.20. Thus the star and the nebula are largely N- and C- enriched and O-depleted.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.