Paper detail

A Consensus Protocol under Directed Communications with Two Time Delays and Delay Scheduling

This paper studies a consensus protocol over a group of agents driven by second order dynamics. The communication among members of the group is assumed to be directed and affected by two rationally independent time delays, one in the position and the other in the velocity information channels. These delays are unknown but considered to be constant and uniform throughout the system. The stability of the consensus protocol is studied using a simplifying factorization procedure and deploying the Cluster Treatment of Characteristic Roots (CTCR) paradigm. This effort results in a unique depiction of the exact stability boundaries in the domain of the delays. CTCR requires the knowledge of the potential stability switching loci exhaustively within this domain. The creation of these loci is an important contribution of this work. It is done in a new surrogate coordinate system, called the \emph{Spectral Delay Space (SDS)}. The relative stability, i.e., the speed to reach consensus of the system is also investigated for this class of systems. Based on the outcome of this effort, a paradoxical control design concept is introduced. It is called the \emph{Delay Scheduling}, which is another key contribution of this paper. It reveals that the performance of the system may be improved by increasing the delays. The amount of increase, however, is only revealed by the CTCR. Example case studies are presented to verify the underlying analytical derivations.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.