Paper detail

A conjecture on demographic mortality at high ages

The study considers the model of an abstract organism, called Arbitrary Oscillator (ArbO), which is capable of making decisions at each timed step. These decisions are 'critical' since, randomly, their outcome can be 'fatal' for ArbO, thus bringing its life cycle to an end. If we impose limits on the total number of critical decisions using a fixed parameter TC (Total Cases), we can treat the statistical distribution of fatal events over a large number of ArbOs using statistical mechanics methods. This results in a mathematically definable asymmetric 'bell' distribution, which can be compared with demographic mortality curves (dx curves), with an appropriate choice of time scale (one step = five years). Our conjecture assumes that, as demographic longevity improves, i.e., with the lengthening of lifespan, the actual demographic curves will increasingly match the mathematical distribution curve of our ArbO. The statistical distribution of the ArbO was introduced by the author in a previous paper and is here recalled and formalized analytically and its characteristics are detailed. The above said conjecture is based on two case studies: mortality in the United States from 1900 to 2017 and mortality in Italy from 1974 to 2019. The conjecture, applied to both case studies, appears reasonable. Tables and comparison figures are provided to support this. Also, an attempt to predict demographic mortality behavior and limitations for the years to come is provided. Finally, the more general theme of the nature of human aging can also be related to our conjecture, since it can highlight the presence of an absolute limit on the number of 'critical' events (the TC parameter). As 'critical' events accumulate over time by aging, approaching the final limit value, the probability of death will tend toward one.

preprint2025arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.