Paper detail

A Conflict-Based Path-Generation Heuristic for Evacuation Planning

Evacuation planning and scheduling is a critical aspect of disaster management and national security applications. This paper proposes a conflict-based path-generation approach for evacuation planning. Its key idea is to generate evacuation routes lazily for evacuated areas and to optimize the evacuation over these routes in a master problem. Each new path is generated to remedy conflicts in the evacuation and adds new columns and a new row in the master problem. The algorithm is applied to massive flood scenarios in the Hawkesbury-Nepean river (West Sydney, Australia) which require evacuating in the order of 70,000 persons. The proposed approach reduces the number of variables from 4,500,000 in a Mixed Integer Programming (MIP) formulation to 30,000 in the case study. With this approach, realistic evacuations scenarios can be solved near-optimally in real time, supporting both evacuation planning in strategic, tactical, and operational environments.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.