Paper detail

A Computer-Aided Diagnosis System Using Artificial Intelligence for Hip Fractures -Multi-Institutional Joint Development Research-

[Objective] To develop a Computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system for plane frontal hip X-rays with a deep learning model trained on a large dataset collected at multiple centers. [Materials and Methods]. We included 5295 cases with neck fracture or trochanteric fracture who were diagnosed and treated by orthopedic surgeons using plane X-rays or computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) who visited each institution between April 2009 and March 2019 were enrolled. Cases in which both hips were not included in the photographing range, femoral shaft fractures, and periprosthetic fractures were excluded, and 5242 plane frontal pelvic X-rays obtained from 4,851 cases were used for machine learning. These images were divided into 5242 images including the fracture side and 5242 images without the fracture side, and a total of 10484 images were used for machine learning. A deep convolutional neural network approach was used for machine learning. Pytorch 1.3 and Fast.ai 1.0 were used as frameworks, and EfficientNet-B4, which is pre-trained ImageNet model, was used. In the final evaluation, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F-value and area under the curve (AUC) were evaluated. Gradient-weighted class activation mapping (Grad-CAM) was used to conceptualize the diagnostic basis of the CAD system. [Results] The diagnostic accuracy of the learning model was accuracy of 96. 1 %, sensitivity of 95.2 %, specificity of 96.9 %, F-value of 0.961, and AUC of 0.99. The cases who were correct for the diagnosis showed generally correct diagnostic basis using Grad-CAM. [Conclusions] The CAD system using deep learning model which we developed was able to diagnose hip fracture in the plane X-ray with the high accuracy, and it was possible to present the decision reason.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.