Paper detail

A computational study of the effects of remodelled electrophysiology and mechanics on initiation of ventricular fibrillation in human heart failure

The study of pathological cardiac conditions such as arrhythmias, a major cause of mortality in heart failure, is becoming increasingly informed by computational simulation, numerically modelling the governing equations. This can provide insight where experimental work is constrained by technical limitations and/or ethical issues. As the models become more realistic, the construction of efficient and accurate computational models becomes increasingly challenging. In particular, recent developments have started to couple the electrophysiology models with mechanical models in order to investigate the effect of tissue deformation on arrhythmogenesis, thus introducing an element of nonlinearity into the mathematical representation. This paper outlines a biophysically-detailed computational model of coupled electromechanical cardiac activity which uses the finite element method to approximate both electrical and mechanical systems on unstructured, deforming, meshes. An ILU preconditioner is applied to improve performance of the solver. This software is used to examine the role of electrophysiology, fibrosis and mechanical deformation on the stability of spiral wave dynamics in human ventricular tissue by applying it to models of both healthy and failing tissue. The latter was simulated by modifying (i) cellular electrophysiological properties, to generate an increased action potential duration and altered intracellular calcium handling, and (ii) tissue-level properties, to simulate the gap junction remodelling, fibrosis and increased tissue stiffness seen in heart failure. The resulting numerical experiments suggest that, for the chosen mathematical models of electrophysiology and mechanical response, introducing tissue level fibrosis can have a destabilising effect on the dynamics, while the net effect of the electrophysiological remodelling stabilises the system.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.