Paper detail

A Computation Model with Automatic Functions and Relations as Primitive Operations

Prior work of Hartmanis and Simon (Hartmanis and Simon, 1974) and Floyd and Knuth (Floyd and Knuth, 1990) investigated what happens if a device uses primitive steps more natural than single updates of a Turing tape. One finding was that in the numerical setting, addition, subtraction, comparisons and bit-wise Boolean operations of numbers preserve polynomial time while incorporating concatenation or multiplication allows to solve all PSPACE problems in polynomially many steps. Therefore we propose to use updates and comparisons with automatic functions as primitive operations and use constantly many registers; the resulting model covers all primitive operations of Hartmanis and Simon as well as Floyd and Knuth, but the model remains in polynomial time. The present work investigates in particular the deterministic complexity of various natural problems and also gives an overview on the nondeterministic complexity of this model.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.