Paper detail

A Computable Figure of Merit for Quasi-Monte Carlo Point Sets

Let $\mathcal{P} \subset [0,1)^S$ be a finite point set of cardinality $N$ in an $S$-dimensional cube, and let $f:[0,1)^S \to \mathbb{R}$ be an integrable function. A QMC integration of $f$ by $\mathcal{P}$ is the average of values of $f$ at each point in $\mathcal{P}$, which approximates the integration of $f$ over the cube. Assume that $\mathcal{P}$ is constructed from an $\mathbb{F}2$-vector space $P\subset (\F2^n)^S$ by means of a digital net with $n$-digit precision. As an $n$-digit discretized version of Josef Dick's method, we introduce Walsh figure of merit (WAFOM) $\textnormal{WF}(P)$ of $P$, which satisfies a Koksma-Hlawka type inequality, namely, QMC integration error is bounded by $C_{S,n}||f||_n \textnormal{WF}(P)$ under $n$-smoothness of $f$, where $C_{S,n}$ is a constant depending only on $S,n$. We show a Fourier inversion formula for $\textnormal{WF}(P)$ which is computable in $O(n SN)$ steps. This effectiveness enables us a random search for $P$ with small value of $\textnormal{WF}(P)$, which would be difficult for other figures of merit such as discrepancy. From an analogy to coding theory, we expect that random search may find better point sets than mathematical constructions. In fact, a naïve search finds point sets $P$ with small $\textnormal{WF}(P)$. In experiments, we show better performance of these point sets in QMC integration than widely used QMC rules. We show some experimental evidence on the effectiveness of our point sets to even non-smooth integrands appearing in finance.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.