Paper detail

A Comprehensive Study of the GeoPass User Authentication Scheme

Before deploying a new user authentication scheme, it is critical to subject the scheme to comprehensive study. Few works, however, have undertaken such a study. Recently, Thorpe et al. proposed GeoPass, the most promising of a class of user authentication schemes based on geographic locations in online maps. Their study showed very high memorability (97%) and satisfactory resilience against online guessing, which means that GeoPass has compelling features for real-world use. No comprehensive study, however, has been conducted for GeoPass or any other location-based password scheme. In this paper, we present a systematic approach for the detailed evaluation of a password system, which we implement to study GeoPass. We conducted three separate studies to evaluate the suitability of GeoPass for widespread use. First, we performed a field study over two months, in which users in a real-world setting remembered their location-passwords 96% of the time and showed improvement with more login sessions. Second, we conducted a study to test how users would fare with multiple location-passwords and found that users remembered their location-passwords in less than 70% of login sessions, with 40% of login failures due to interference effects. Third, we conducted a study to examine the resilience of GeoPass against shoulder surfing. Our participants played the role of attackers and had an overall success rate of 48%. Based on our results, we suggest suitable applications of GeoPass in its current state and identify aspects of GeoPass that must be improved before widespread deployment could be considered.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.