Paper detail

A comprehensive study of the discovery potential of NOvA, T2K and T2HK experiments

With the recent measurement of reactor mixing angle $θ_{13}$ the knowledge of neutrino oscillation parameters that describe PMNS matrix has improved significantly except the CP violating phase $δ_{CP}$. The other unknown parameters in neutrino oscillation studies are mass hierarchy and the octant of the atmospheric mixing angle $θ_{23}$. Many dedicated experiments are proposed to determine these parameters which may take at least 10 years from now to become operational. It is therefore very crucial to use the results from the existing experiments to see whether we can get even partial answers to these questions. In this paper we study the discovery potential of the ongoing NO$ν$A and T2K experiments as well as the forthcoming T2HK experiment in addressing these questions. In particular, we evaluate the sensitivity of NO$ν$A to determine neutrino mass hierarchy, octant degeneracy and to obtain CP violation phase after running for its scheduled period of 3 years in neutrino mode and 3 years in anti-neutrino mode. We then extend the analysis to understand the discovery potential if the experiments will run for (5$ν$+5$\barν$) years and (7$ν$+3$\barν$) years. We also show how the sensitivity improves when we combine the data from (3$ν$+3$\barν$) years of NO$ν$A run with (3$ν$+2$\barν$) years of T2K and (3$ν$+7$\barν$) years of T2HK experiments. The CP violation sensitivity is marginal for T2K and NO$ν$A experiments even for ten years data taking of NO$ν$A. T2HK has a significance above 5$σ$ for a fraction of two-fifth values of the $δ_{CP}$ space. We also find that $δ_{CP}$ can be determined to be better than $35^\circ $, $21^\circ $ and $9^\circ $ for all values of $δ_{CP}$ for T2K, NO$ν$A and T2HK respectively.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.